3 ms·
Predicting the next token perfectly would make a chatbot an omniscient god, as it could tell you things like the lottery numbers from next week. Chatbots "just"
by grumbel 4y ago
Predicting the next token perfectly would make a chatbot an omniscient god, as it could tell you things like the lottery numbers from next week. Chatbots "just" being a token predictors does not limit their power or intelligence in any way. It however also doesn't tell you how good they are at their job.
If you want to test how good a chatbot is at predicting tokens, well, you just have to test it. You can throw a Winograd schema challenge at it, or let it take part in code competition or exams, let it solve puzzles and all that. Quick simple test will for example show you that ChatGPT isn't any good at calculating, as the answers will just be wrong.
As for awareness, we know what ChatGPT is aware of: Its 4000 token history and whatever information it learned from the training data. That's the grand total of its existence, it doesn't get any other input, it doesn't perceive time, it doesn't learn, that history is all there is to it. And we can call that awareness as ChatGPT is able to perform correct prediction based on that token history.
For consciousness there are still a lot of basic parts missing, such as the perception of time, senses to act with some external world, the ability to think for itself without getting explicitly prompted and all that.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- maxbond 4y agoI'm not really interested in how well or poorly the models perform (in this context), I'm trying to understand why people have certain ideas about them. I think you and I are generally in agreement about consciousness and awareness. I think consciousness is an interaction of an agent with it's environment, rather than an agent in isolation. I guess that's why I find this attitude that consciousness is a matter of feeding enough data into a static training process confusing. I think it's a kind of is-ought problem where I ask about the "ought" and people express the "is" and we end up talking past each other. But I don't really have a good hypothesis to disprove this either, so I'll have to meditate on that. I think it may be testable but it's challenging to model.