4 ms·
Wow, this could be huge for enabling more efficient rendering of also more basic animations and effects on the web making it a smooth experience.
by iamsanteri 4y ago
Wow, this could be huge for enabling more efficient rendering of also more basic animations and effects on the web making it a smooth experience.
- illiarian 4y agoIf your entire site/app is in WebGPU then yes I guess? Otherwise it does nothing for "smooth animations on the web"
- kevingadd 4y agoNot really. If you want smooth and efficient rendering of basic animations/effects, you should be using CSS, because then the browser will natively rasterize, scroll and composite everything in parallel using hardware acceleration. It's far more efficient than rendering basic elements with WebGL and will probably be better than WebGPU in most cases.
- jug 4y agoDear god no, use CSS for that. It's already hardware accelerated in the regular browsers. You're talking of website presentation and that's the purpose of CSS.