As always my first question in these articles is… Was it ChatGPT 3.5 or 4? It’s an interesting article with the real world examples that are hard to come by th

As always my first question in these articles is… Was it ChatGPT 3.5 or 4? It’s an interesting article with the real world examples that are hard to come by this early, but it’s also two entirely different ChatGPT’s here. They can’t even compare in this context. 3.5 still has glaring LLM-like issues and is useless in a professional context like this, but at least they begin to fade away in 4. So can we please stop calling it simply ChatGPT?