4 ms·
I'm unsure of the criteria for the reward, but it appears that they considered it an impressive effort to defend an unsympathetic client. The public benefit fr
by musicale 4y ago
I'm unsure of the criteria for the reward, but it appears that they considered it an impressive effort to defend an unsympathetic client.
The public benefit from presenting a vigorous defense in all cases (not just ones with sympathetic defendants) is to require the prosecution, as a matter of course, to actually prove their case in accordance with the law, something which should be required in a fair court system.
- musicale 4y ago*award
- bglazer 4y agoHow does a corporation filing a sham bankruptcy to avoid paying out a legally mandated penalty improve justice? I can just as easily say that this tactic degrades prosecutorial effectiveness because it disincentives lawyers from taking cases. The corporations will just spin off and kill a business unit and no one gets compensated.
- weq 4y agoBecause Captailism has corrupted our institutions to the point that money rules everything. Democracy and Justice is only for those with enough cash. Like the big4 accounting firms, they arnt the big 4 because they serve the public the public interest. They are the goto because they have the influence and the knowledge to extract as much cash as possible from democracies.
- eurasiantiger 4y agoAlso, they enable money laundering on massive scales. KPMG, I’m staring at you.
- musicale 4y agoIf I'm reading it correctly, the award was not for inventing or implementing the bankrupcty tactic, but for litigating the two cases.