2 ms·
The thing is, this is simplistic example. It's not just about pure semantics nitpicking. That render decomposition works for sibling elements. However, when t
by aatd86 4y ago
The thing is, this is simplistic example. It's not just about pure semantics nitpicking.
That render decomposition works for sibling elements.
However, when there is a parent child relationship between html elements, the child can only be inserted on an existing parent.
Basically, render(a(b)) is not render(ab) where a(b) denotes that the html element a depends on the html element b for its definition.
- valenterry 4y ago> Basically, render(a(b)) is not render(ab) where a(b) denotes that the html element a depends on the html element b for its definition. This is a new example. How does that contradict any of the previous points that I (and the OP) made? I fail to see that, can you explain?