> This eco-authoritarianism needs to be stopped. Just a little reminder that authoritarian is an insult, a couple little facts that might counter your fashion

> This eco-authoritarianism needs to be stopped. Just a little reminder that authoritarian is an insult, a couple little facts that might counter your fashion-authoritarianism I strongly believe the UN are kinda reliable as a source. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/environmental-costs-fast-fashion https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/environmental-co... > I’d rather let the world burn than live in it without beauty and beautiful people. Have you got a subscription to "false dichotomy magazine"? You seems to reason only in two ways: your way or everybody else is stupid and has no taste whatsoever. I come from one of the most beautiful countries in the World, I am surrounded by beauty, a beauty that don't need to burn fossil fuels to keep being beautiful. > When the day comes when people aren’t allowed to dress beautifully That's exactly what nobody said. You're the only one saying that the only way to dress beautifully is by burning a planet (????) > I know at least I will revolt Yeah, about that, you won't. We all know that. Just, please, stop it. Being flamboyant is a form of art, you think you're Vivienne Westwood (which I actually met) but you're only a little insignificant imitator (edit: wrote hater, it wasn't the word I was looking for). > God bless those “cheap rags” I say. Lucky us God does not exist, cheap rags are a by-product of the ad industry. Thank them. EDIT: Now that I think about it, I wrote "not considering the environment". Isn't this the place where the rules advice us to Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith I, in good faith, didn't want to talk about the environmental damages, because they are so vast and undeniable, that it would have made the entire discussion pointless. We need to ban fast fashion because we need to, you would set the World on fire before that, I would put you on fire before having to take some more drastic measures so that you could dress in rags. And because it's immoral, unethical, and based on slavery. Besides, a lot of garments have already been produced, it's not like we are living in an era where there's a shortage of clothes and we need to constantly make something new or your wardrobe will be empty as will your soul! You can buy all my beautiful rags from the 70s-80s-90s for a luxury price, they are the real deal, do you want them or you just like rags that imitate the past, but are produced with new, cheaper, weaker, less durable materials? Let me know.