You all have good points. It's important to separate the right to a decision from the right to an opinion. Obviously the founder no longer has any right to infl

You all have good points. It's important to separate the right to a decision from the right to an opinion. Obviously the founder no longer has any right to influence the decision here. But I don't think there's any reason to assume he no longer has a right to a personal opinion about it. I think it's crazy to suggest that someone can't simultaneously 1) no longer want to run something themselves but also 2) not want to see that thing destroyed entirely.