But here's what happens when I try that : Me : I don't understand this publicly documented AWS service with plenty of OSS examples, can you suggest how I wou

But here's what happens when I try that : Me : I don't understand this publicly documented AWS service with plenty of OSS examples, can you suggest how I would solve some edge case X GPT : Oh that's easy, invents bullshit that sounds exactly like what I need Me : Googles the shit the GPT came up with and can't find any references Me : Maybe there is something similar - spends more time searching Me : GPT you're wrong - your solution doesn't exist GPT : Oh sorry, here's the correct solution, comes up with more bulshit Me : Googles the shit that GPT came up with and can't find any references Me : Starts googling and solving the problem on my own Me : Finds out X can't be done with AWS service I've had this flow many times now, it never resulted in valuable output from GPT vs just Googling since I need to verify everything anyway. Or Me : Review and come up with improvements to this code : CP code GPT : Suggest bullshit improvements, gives factually wrong reasoning, makes code worse Me : Points out everything wrong GPT : Suggest other bullshit improvements Me : Points out everything wrong GPT : Returns basically identical code to input Or Me : Propose a design to this technical problem GPT : Implements the solution in the most roundabout way and suboptimal way IMO if I'm not sure what the output should be GPT is less than worthless it's actually convincingly misleading.