> 50 years ago? Surely that can’t be terribly dispositive of what the city is today It's relevant because at the time, like today, SF was seen as exhibit A of

> 50 years ago? Surely that can’t be terribly dispositive of what the city is today It's relevant because at the time, like today, SF was seen as exhibit A of liberalism run amok, and yet couldn't unite against a homophobic assassination of their own elected officials. Now, the zeitgeist insists that SF's broken homeless policies come from misplaced liberal compassion as opposed to a long history of neglect and corruption, which was particularly acute toward hispanic and black communities.