3 ms·
Industry is very good at mitigating risks with procedures and detection. Homeowners, not so much. >Serious incidents are rare. Even so, they're probably more
by somewhat_drunk 4y ago
Industry is very good at mitigating risks with procedures and detection. Homeowners, not so much.
>Serious incidents are rare.
Even so, they're probably more common than you think. Google it.
>there hasn't been a single hydrogen car that has exploded
Uh... google "hydrogen car explosion."
>So just from that your argument is just lazy fearmongering and FUD.
So far, every point you've made has been weak or outright incorrect. Meanwhile, you have yet to seriously challenge any point I've made.
The reason for this isn't that I'm better at this than you. Your position is simply untenable.
I hope you figure out how to account for the bias that so obviously pervades your thought process. Cheers, I guess.
- _hypx 4y agoThere literally hasn't been a single hydrogen car that has exploded. You can only cite examples of people carrying hydrogen and due to incompetence it started a fire or explosion. Meanwhile, many people have died in fires in existing cars, including BEVs. Sorry, but you are a liar. Your attitude is just a mask for your BS.
- somewhat_drunk 4y agoWorldwide, about 50,000 FCEVs have been sold, vs about 7 million BEVs. Comparing the safety of the two on an absolute basis isn't just dumb, it's intentionally misleading. Pretty sure at this point you're a paid propagandist. If that's true: fuck you, die in a fire. If not: I sincerely hope you learn how to think critically at some point. Have a nice day.
- _hypx 4y agoAnd until 15 years ago, nearly zero BEVs have sold. Meanwhile, >1 billion ICE cars have been sold. You literally are the dumbest person on this site I've met. Not are you incredibly stupid, you act like you have actual knowledge. You clearly are in the Dunning-Kruger zone, assuming you aren't intentionally trolling.