True and healthy skepticism requires evidence and pointing skepticism at things that deserves skepticism. Questioning whether plants produce food by photosynth

True and healthy skepticism requires evidence and pointing skepticism at things that deserves skepticism. Questioning whether plants produce food by photosynthesis from the light of the sun because "science" has been wrong before isn't skepticism in any meaningful sense. Russia's roulette wheel of dishonest justifications for the war and countless other documented war crimes would lend one to directing skepticism toward questioning any legitimate humanitarian basis for this invasion. There have been a litany of other documented war crimes by Russia -- why would imprisoning dissidents trip your "skepticism" red flags?