4 ms·
Wrong: first item should be environments as first class types. Much of the rest follows. And you can stick it to smarmy common lisp geeks.
by shubber 15y ago
Wrong: first item should be environments as first class types. Much of the rest follows. And you can stick it to smarmy common lisp geeks.
- jballanc 15y agoThis post does a really good job of analyzing first-class environments and explaining why "first-class environments are useless at best, and dangerous at worst": http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/09/first-class-environments.html http://funcall.blogspot.com/2009/09/first-class-environments...
- pnathan 15y agoI found his argument a bit of a wash. It boiled down to usual critique of macros, operator overloading, and inheritance: "You don't know what's going to happen". Meh, most of the time it's not a problem, when it is, it's for a good reason, and if it's for a bad reason, you probably should choose a different software package that is written better.