3 ms·
Even that isn't as clear-cut as it seems. It isn't just the company that you need to include. Does your company produce ads for the company that produces Propr
by Broken_Hippo 4y ago
Even that isn't as clear-cut as it seems. It isn't just the company that you need to include.
Does your company produce ads for the company that produces Proprietary Toy and get money if they sell more products?
Does your company supply batteries for Battery Operated Proprietary Toy?
Does your store sell either Proprietary Toy?
And so on.
- giraffe_lady 4y agoIt really is though. > Does your company produce ads There it is, don't do that. All these other questions are also just "yes." You're looking for nuance where there isn't any. Sponsorship is ads, product placement is ads, giving free product to influencer to review is ads. There are certainly edge cases some of them likely to be thorny but none of the things either of us has mentioned so far are them.
- joenot443 4y agoI think there’s absolutely nuance here and pretending “make it illegal for kids to see ads” is a simple or even attainable solution is a bit naive I think. What about product placement? Nearly every movie in Hollywood from the past 40 years has some level of product placement, so under this new law we’ll either go back and edit it out or slap an R rating on it? How about arena ads or billboards? Special AR headsets for teens which will block ads from sight? It’s a silly hypothetical, of course, but you did just say that it’s a hypothetical without nuance. I think it’s easier to imagine a world where advertising is outlaws entirely than one where we specifically shield it only for those underage.
- giraffe_lady 4y agoOn further reflection it may effectively ban advertising completely and this makes me like the idea even more.
- joenot443 4y agoI’d be on board with that!