3 ms·
There's no point if you don't have energy to store. Only 1% of potential sites need to be developed https://re100.eng.anu.edu.au/global/ https://re100.eng.anu.
by Schroedingersat 4y ago
There's no point if you don't have energy to store. Only 1% of potential sites need to be developed
https://re100.eng.anu.edu.au/global/ https://re100.eng.anu.edu.au/global/
Probably won't happen because batteries will be even cheaper by the time much of it is developed.
- robertlagrant 4y agoThat link is what makes me concerned when talking on these topics. Far too much certainty and trust seem to be derived from and placed in such studies. In this case, from the study: > None of the PHES sites discussed in this study have been the subject of geological, hydrological, environmental, heritage and other studies, and it is not known whether any particular site would be suitable. The commercial feasibility of developing these sites is unknown.
- Schroedingersat 4y ago> makes me concerned There it is. Always so concerned" about whatever imaginary downside alternatives have, but completely credulous about nuclear which has failed over and over again. You're claiming without any evidence whatsoever that at least 99% of geographically appropriate sites are unusable.
- robertlagrant 4y ago> Always so concerned" about whatever imaginary downside alternatives have It's not a downside. It's a problem with the study. > completely credulous about nuclear which has failed over and over again Can you cite where I've done this? > You're claiming without any evidence whatsoever that at least 99% of geographically appropriate sites are unusable. And where I've done this?