2 ms·
Garry Tan and police unions from multiple cities funding a big campaign? https://www.theinformation.com/articles/garry-tan-vs-chesa-boudin-the-san-francisco-po
by Apocryphon 4y ago
Garry Tan and police unions from multiple cities funding a big campaign?
https://www.theinformation.com/articles/garry-tan-vs-chesa-boudin-the-san-francisco-political-scene-gets-a-new-tech-combatant https://www.theinformation.com/articles/garry-tan-vs-chesa-b...
https://twitter.com/jackiefielder_/status/1641656117083381760 https://twitter.com/jackiefielder_/status/164165611708338176...
Maybe recalling Boudin is right or not, but either way when a lot of money is injected into a campaign, it tends to influence outcomes. Just see Prop 22.
- shuckles 4y agoBoudin had plenty of donors from around the country (including from billionaires) and was getting free puff pieces placed about him in The New Yorker about his Los Angeles fundraisers. Money flows in all directions.
- Apocryphon 4y agoCertainly, but not equally. > By June, the groups seeking to recall Boudin together raised $7.2 million to oust him, while the district attorney’s backers gathered about $3.3 million. https://www.sfchronicle.com/election/article/Chesa-Boudin-ousted-as-San-Francisco-District-17226641.php https://www.sfchronicle.com/election/article/Chesa-Boudin-ou...
- shuckles 4y agoYes because by that point Boudin had lost his electoral credibility. It's instructive to see who funded his original run for DA.
- Apocryphon 4y agoThe narrative was against Boudin by the time of the recall, but that campaign was nevertheless still funded by big money, which has a tendency to amplify narratives, and this entire discussion was focused on the recall anyway.
- shuckles 4y agoThe entire discussion has no focus and starts with a false claim about violent crime being down between 2020 and 2022. In any case, claims that money influenced outcomes are ill-substantiated since many San Francisco election results go against the best-funded outcomes.
- Apocryphon 4y agoThough apparently, neither in the case of the election of Boudin, nor in his recall! https://ballotpedia.org/District_Attorney_election_in_San_Francisco,_California_(2019)#Campaign_finance https://ballotpedia.org/District_Attorney_election_in_San_Fr... https://ballotpedia.org/Chesa_Boudin_recall,_San_Francisco,_California_(2021-2022)#Election_spending https://ballotpedia.org/Chesa_Boudin_recall,_San_Francisco,_...
- shuckles 4y agoYes, even in that case. In a ranked choice election, you cannot simply look at the numbers in isolation. The opponents to Boudin ran something of a slate where they cross-promoted each other. So in a real sense, Boudin won despite being outspent in 2020. (Though there is a compelling case to make that Boudin's victory was mostly a fluke due to Nancy Tung's Cantonese language voters being misled by local Chinese-only newspapers about policy positions.)
- fogzen 4y agoIt is not a false claim. Violent crime is more than homicides. Violent crime was down according to SF city police department: https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/7kTBb/1/ https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/7kTBb/1/ You can see more statistics in the discussion here: https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Chesa-Boudin-San-Fra https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Chesa-Boudin-San-Fra... Homicides were not outside of historical trends during Boudin's tenure. A few homicides difference across years has nothing to do with the DA.
- shuckles 4y ago