3 ms·
Worked one place where we received seven (7!) resumes that were almost identical, with the same project of what they could do. Not saying leetcode is the answe
by LanceH 4y ago
Worked one place where we received seven (7!) resumes that were almost identical, with the same project of what they could do.
Not saying leetcode is the answer, but it does solve for something things.
My interviews tend to walk through the framework of a project and they can speak to me in the abstract, or an example of what that part of the project does. Say there is a standard way of connecting to the database like in Rails. They can tell me about database.yml and how it has different entries for each of the databases. Then we have a conversation about checking in passwords to git, env variables, secrets managers, etc... This avoids asking stock questions which might be coached/studied more and aims for what the person doing the work might practically know. It also keeps the discussion in a context that makes understanding the questions (hopefully) easier. My style of interviews are very much non-standardized and there has to be some trust that I have some idea what I'm doing.
Leetcode at least has some standardization around the problem. Of course everyone could have looked them up and studied the exact solution, and these solutions don't correspond very well to daily efforts. But, given everyone knows the game, it does demonstrate some horsepower I guess. Or maybe I like these interviews because I'm good at them.
- moose_man 4y agoThey should all fail if they are all identical. You look for someone who can build something extraordinary, who takes the parameters and runs with them.
- yieldcrv 4y agoExtraordinary is too subjective in my experience When I’m competing for one position and “we just want to see how you think” is always not true but instead a completely arbitrary set of criteria not presented to the candidate, it should be sanctionable