4 ms·
The asker thought they were. They were not. The internet is big and human memories are not. As an aside, I’m really starting to hate these threads on here, peo
by Godel_unicode 4y ago
The asker thought they were. They were not. The internet is big and human memories are not.
As an aside, I’m really starting to hate these threads on here, people are constantly reading words that aren’t there in search of gotcha-it’s-skynet. It’s not. It’s just pattern matching and randomness with a giant amount of information encoded.
- cjbprime 4y ago> As an aside, I’m really starting to hate these threads on here. I'm not sure what to say, other than that if you'd like to have less frustrating conversations, you could do better than showing up with hearsay where someone asked a question they thought was unique, but it wasn't, and it can't be modified to be unique and then asked again, and you aren't willing to tell us what it was, and possibly don't know yourself. It is not possible to have a serious conversation about your claim, and that's not because it is being intentionally misunderstood. > skynet You're the only person mentioning skynet. The conversation is about a ridiculous claim made up-thread that GPT-4 cannot reason or understand anything, which is disprovable within a few minutes of using it thoughtfully.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- Godel_unicode 4y agoThis is the exact type of unserious wish-reading I’m talking about. Do better.