3 ms·
I think the core idea is strong, but it's missing several features that could differentiate it as a product: 1) adding an "advanced" tab which enables the user
by fzliu 4y ago
I think the core idea is strong, but it's missing several features that could differentiate it as a product:
1) adding an "advanced" tab which enables the user to input more information about the document, e.g. formatting, length, etc...
2) learning the user's writing patterns and style - I'm not sure if this can be done by prompting, but my guess is that there are methods that you can use to steer the prose towards the user's default style
3) plagiarism detection - this would require a large document store and could be implemented using fuzzy/semantic search via Milvus followed by string matching
Keep up the good work.
- stewfortier 4y agoAgree on each suggestions. I’m especially excited about building #2, which I think is a fairly subtle, hard problem to solve.
- Terretta 4y agoMany of us have 20, 30, or more years of written electronic communication. Main issue preventing just* chucking this into one of the LangChains is (a) unrolling email threads mixing many people's writing, (b) keeping partitioned tones (workplaces, topics, networks, cultures) distinct. * No such thing as "just".
- brandall10 4y agoMy thought on #2 is to continually evaluate and store off a 'best' sample of the author's writing taken from everything produced that hits on a number of key metrics (ie. general wordiness, adjective usage, humor, unusual quirks that are statistically significant), then compile that down to where it might seem to be complete gibberish but an effective and performant prompt.