Seemingly an implementation of https://opensource.contentauthenticity.org/ https://opensource.contentauthenticity.org/ From what I can gather, its just a stand

Seemingly an implementation of https://opensource.contentauthenticity.org/ https://opensource.contentauthenticity.org/ From what I can gather, its just a standard approach, nothing to preserve signatures after a file has gone through non-compatible software (which probably even includes uploading onto youtube, uploading onto twitter, discord, instagram, etc) And I'm guessing getting them to sign your content costs money, which in turn probably extends to those who modify the content: If someone wanted to modify your content for free, information leading back to your original would be lost in turn, which... As far as responsibility: (assuming no legislation about proving if something is real or not (which would nullify this software's value add in turn)), Why would I publicly say I didn't pay artists for this content, or I didn't hire who people think I hired. Instead of just publishing the content and hoping no one would notice or care?