4 ms·
Could it swap, so we can have lisp back?
by captaincaveman 4y ago
Could it swap, so we can have lisp back?
- capableweb 4y agoIt would be absolute godsend if we could, so one measly error wouldn't require restarting a entire process just to rewrite some small part.
- TylerE 4y agoThat's really more erlang's niche.
- freilanzer 4y agoNo, that's really Lisps thing.
- capableweb 4y agoI meant more like dynamically re-evaluating specific functions without having to restart the process. Haven't done much Erlang, but my experience is around doing so in lisp rather, which definitely can do that.