I don't believe any such static host would necessarily improve your performance over your own host or s3. Cloudfront is surprisingly inexpensive, especially fo

I don't believe any such static host would necessarily improve your performance over your own host or s3. Cloudfront is surprisingly inexpensive, especially for smaller web applications and websites: http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/ http://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/pricing/ You probably have only a few MBs of static content, cloudfront can be configured to have a cloudfront URL that just fetches from http://yournormalwebsite.com http://yournormalwebsite.com. No S3 bucket involved, no uploading content. Just change your static content URLs to be http://cloudfrontURL/static http://cloudfrontURL/static content. Even with tens of thousands of visitors a month, you'll owe... < $5. Or as suggested elsewhere here, just use cloudflare, which is $0.