>Again, the video is plain dishonest. It compares the free Gmail with the paid 365. Why do we need to assume Microsoft's Hotmail banners are not based on page c

>Again, the video is plain dishonest. It compares the free Gmail with the paid 365. Why do we need to assume Microsoft's Hotmail banners are not based on page content? It was just a news article that a lot of people found interesting, it wasn't really commenting on the merits of the video itself. A lot of people thought it was newsworthy so it was upvoted. But some overly sensitive folks seem to have the idea that it must be buried from more people seeing it, even if there was interest. >ome on... Excellent and Florian Mueller in the same sentence? The only thing I never saw with his name is a criticism of Microsoft. I have to wonder why... And there is never anything postive from Groklaw about Microsoft, I wonder why.... Also, do you realize that flagging articles like that can cause the account to be hell banned unjustly just for thinking such news might be interesting and submitting something that's obviously not spam or otherwise bannable content?