This post is an amalgam of barely formed thoughts followed by..."but fight a class war". It's nonsense from beginning to end. Why is critical data "populist"?

This post is an amalgam of barely formed thoughts followed by..."but fight a class war". It's nonsense from beginning to end. Why is critical data "populist"? Why is undamaged institutional trust your goal? Are institutions inherently trustworthy, or is it that they aren't but should be presented as such? Why are you concerned with the literacy of the audience rather than the content of the article? In your mind, why is is every author's duty to present two arguments (which is not a research mandate, the article being a research summary presented in popular article format). Anointing "experts" is not how science works. Again, the article being equivalent to a research abstract and research being the basis for science. We removed science from the unquestionable "expertise" of the Church many centuries ago. At which point we placed in the hands of research and its critique.