The actual report doesn't say lost or degraded, but rather 'exposed to automation', and right after that statement, they also mention the historical trend of au

The actual report doesn't say lost or degraded, but rather 'exposed to automation', and right after that statement, they also mention the historical trend of automation has been moving people around: >The good news is that worker displacement from automation has historically been offset by creation of new jobs, and the emergence of new occupations following technological innovations accounts for the vast majority of long-run employment growth. This article is a misrepresentation of Goldman's analysis.