Good point and feedback, thank you. We'll update readme. A lot of UX, UI, DX work related to LLMs is completely new. We ourselves have a lot of new realization

Good point and feedback, thank you. We'll update readme. A lot of UX, UI, DX work related to LLMs is completely new. We ourselves have a lot of new realizations. > While you mention that you can bring your own model, prompt, etc, the current main use case seems to be integrating with OpenAI You're right. This is because we started with OpenAI and to be fair it's easiest to use from the DX point of view. We want to make it more open very soon. We probably need more user feedback to learn what would be the best way how this integration should look like. > How, if at all, do you plan to address the current shortcoming that the code generated by it often doesn't work at all without numerous revisions? The AI agents work in a self-repairing loop. For example they write code, get back type errors or a stack trace and then try to fix the code. This works pretty well and often a bigger problem is short context window. We don't think this will replace developers, rather we need to figure out the right feedback loop between the developer and these AI agents. So we expect that developers most likely will edit some code.