3 ms·
I have a really really really hard time thinking we're even remotely close to AGI when I see stuff like: https://imgur.com/eukW66W https://imgur.com/eukW66W Y
by lm28469 4y ago
I have a really really really hard time thinking we're even remotely close to AGI when I see stuff like:
https://imgur.com/eukW66W https://imgur.com/eukW66W
You must have a really convoluted definition of AGI to come to the conclusion gpt is AGI when it proves times and times again it quite literally have no understanding of what it writes
- sharemywin 4y agosee it's already passed the Turing test: https://sports.yahoo.com/24-most-hilariously-bad-spelling-191602032.html https://sports.yahoo.com/24-most-hilariously-bad-spelling-19...
- dandellion 4y agoI said that "I think we are a few breakthroughs away from something could pass as AGI". That means, first, that I don't think we're there and so I don't consider chatgpt AGI, and second that even something that "passes" as AGI at first glance might not necessarily be so under close inspection. But at the same time, I won't call what chatgpt is doing parroting. It's not just repeating input data as-is, at least it's capable of applying some transformations on that data. Most of the time the transformation is useful, occasionally it's pretty borked. Parroting to me would be just repeating the training data without much transformation. > it quite literally have no understanding of what it writes Even though I DON'T think gpt AGI, I don't consider that a deciding factor. Humans can also show no understanding of what we write or read, and I consider us "GI".