> In all ways except .. its output? Which is the only thing that matters? Who decided that this was the only thing that matters? The thing that concerns me is

> In all ways except .. its output? Which is the only thing that matters? Who decided that this was the only thing that matters? The thing that concerns me isn't that it answers questions in a way that resembles a human. What concerns me is that some people think it thinks like a human, which it does not, and writing about it in an anthropomorphic way exacerbates this problem. The issue at hand is not the observable output of the system, but the way in which the system works — which we have knowledge of. It's not magic, it's not emergent, it's not sentient, and it's certainly not intelligent. It's a (very fancy and impressive!) predictive text system. Imbuing it with extra properties is disingenuous.