> the use of "toss" here implies a unreasonableness or inappropriateness that doesn't actually exist. No it doesn't. The lawyer's own language, from the subhe

> the use of "toss" here implies a unreasonableness or inappropriateness that doesn't actually exist. No it doesn't. The lawyer's own language, from the subhead of the article: > Musk's lawyers called Dogecoin "a legitimate cryptocurrency" and the lawsuit, Johnson v. Musk et al., a "fanciful work of fiction." Even if the lawyers hadn't used that language, "toss" is a commonly used colloquial term (which fits for a casual news site like gizmodo) for exactly what they're requesting and doesn't imply an "unreasonableness" or "inappropriateness".