4 ms·
I think it depends on if the output space is shared. In the case of MidJourney the output is in Discord for all to see. Setting community standards like no-por
by jpgvm 4y ago
I think it depends on if the output space is shared.
In the case of MidJourney the output is in Discord for all to see. Setting community standards like no-porn is about creating a space where the most possible people will feel welcome. I would like to think a policy of "no disrespectful imagery" of legally-protected deities or figures wouldn't be that burdensome as a whole. It also helps to avoid drama. There is probably places that such drama would be a welcome addition but I get the feeling MidJourney is not one of those places.
I'm not saying we should bake such constraints into the models, that I think is in poor taste and unnecessary. If people can run the model on their own machine where the output is private to them they should be allowed to generate whatever they want and they can post that in venues where that sort of content is acceptable.
But when images are emitted into a public shared space I do think some rules on what is and isn't appropriate are fair game. At the end of the day it's meant to be an AI art community that is about the fusion of technology and creativity. It's not setup to be a place for political discourse.
- tekknik 4y agoDiscord is banned in China. If any Chinese who agree with Chinese law are on Discord they are violated said law. So no, not this.