I agree word play is always an issue. Keep in mind we start over every generation. We keep training on new data. I've also thought about human development and

I agree word play is always an issue. Keep in mind we start over every generation. We keep training on new data. I've also thought about human development and what I find interesting is that an anatomical modern human is not automatically capable of forming modern civilization (see isolated tribes still living and general hunter gatherer history in general). There is so, so much that depends on emergent factors like some sort of global or societal intelligence. I'm thinking AI has the same characteristics. It's not about the individuals, it's about "society". > 50,000 years ago we knew basically nothing, and even language itself may not have been developed I think language is substantially older than that, but it is a hot area of debate.