4 ms·
It doesn't really need a citation at all. It's pretty standard for people to be considered as "founders" even if they weren't the first person to be involved in
by jeffparsons 4y ago
It doesn't really need a citation at all. It's pretty standard for people to be considered as "founders" even if they weren't the first person to be involved in the first incarnation of a business. The only reason this particular instance got any attention is because of the lawsuit.
If you're curious, pick a few companies at random and dig into their history. You might be surprised by how late some of their "founders" became involved in the business.
- random314 4y agoSome one else abusing the term "founder" doesn't change anything. Musk was an investor who made himself CEO several years later.
- tim333 4y agoFounded July 2003. Musk became chairman and largest shareholder Feb 2004.
- random314 4y agoCalling Musk a founder would be the equivalent of calling Paul Graham an Airbnb cofounder. He was an early investor in Tesla in February 2003 after the first employee had already been hired and the prototype car was already built off the Lotus. 1.