3 ms·

I have some mid-grade Rode Wireless Go and nice >$100 Samsung lavaier mics I can use when needed, which is faultless, reliable, amazing prosumer gear no one cou

I have some mid-grade Rode Wireless Go and nice >$100 Samsung lavaier mics I can use when needed, which is faultless, reliable, amazing prosumer gear no one could conceivably gripe about, but honestly the Actis Pro headset I have is probably a better choice for both cases. The Actis has better microphone positioning by far, which counts for so much. I'm interested to test the range versus the Rode, but given that I can be 3 floors away & the Actis still fine, I'd be surprised if the Rode really had shockingly better range/reliability/interference-resistance. I continue to think there's a paranoia & level-of-concern that does not match what modern hardware can do.

vladvasiliu 4y ago
> I continue to think there's a paranoia & level-of-concern that does not match what modern hardware can do. I think this is related to the fact that most wireless headphones people have experience with are Bluetooth. BT headphones have lag, and, when used in duplex mode, have terrible quality. And this lag adds to the one introduced by the conferencing software. I've got myself a Jabra headset that communicates over DECT. This thing is spectacular. No discernible lag (as tested with games) and the mic quality is better than what I hear from people rocking Bose and Sony BT headphones. The range is great, too. Much better than what I get from my BT headphones.
- xpil 4y ago
  Agreed! I also use DECT based headset (Poly i.e. ex-Plantronics - recently acquired by HP) and it is amazingly good. Range up to f*ckintillion meters (anywhere within the house or garden basically), up to 8 hours use on a single charge (I regularly forget to charge it overnight and I can still use it the next day), no delays, no weird disconnects in the middle of a call, great mic quality and it works both with my PC and home landline.
j45 4y ago
Wireless bluetooth headset mics can vary wildly (rtings.com has nice breakdowns). I have tested a few and find the noise cancelling on the mic for the other party is awful if that's something you are looking for on far too many.

vladvasiliu 4y ago

> I continue to think there's a paranoia & level-of-concern that does not match what modern hardware can do. I think this is related to the fact that most wireless headphones people have experience with are Bluetooth. BT headphones have lag, and, when used in duplex mode, have terrible quality. And this lag adds to the one introduced by the conferencing software. I've got myself a Jabra headset that communicates over DECT. This thing is spectacular. No discernible lag (as tested with games) and the mic quality is better than what I hear from people rocking Bose and Sony BT headphones. The range is great, too. Much better than what I get from my BT headphones.

xpil 4y ago
Agreed! I also use DECT based headset (Poly i.e. ex-Plantronics - recently acquired by HP) and it is amazingly good. Range up to f*ckintillion meters (anywhere within the house or garden basically), up to 8 hours use on a single charge (I regularly forget to charge it overnight and I can still use it the next day), no delays, no weird disconnects in the middle of a call, great mic quality and it works both with my PC and home landline.

j45 4y ago

Wireless bluetooth headset mics can vary wildly (rtings.com has nice breakdowns). I have tested a few and find the noise cancelling on the mic for the other party is awful if that's something you are looking for on far too many.