4 ms·
The unions will not fade. Their biggest membership comes from federal government workers, whose numbers burgeoned under Bush and are bound to grow under Obama.
by Prrometheus 18y ago
The unions will not fade. Their biggest membership comes from federal government workers, whose numbers burgeoned under Bush and are bound to grow under Obama. Also, union firms like GM are getting $billions from the Federal Government to make up for the fact that they can't turn a profit on the market (the airlines did this, too). Tax money will keep them alive even if they are the dinosaurs of the marketplace.
When anti-China tariffs come down the line, you can thank the unions. Obama will not deny them. You can also nix the idea of school choice under an Obama administration, since the National Teacher's Union is a strong supporter of the Democratic Party. It's no wonder that Obama's plan for education is basically "more money! more money!". The unions couldn't have written a more favorable plan themselves.
- davidw 18y agoThe unions have been fading, though. Under Reagan, Bush Sr., Clinton, and onwards I'd rather have weak, declining unions than strong anti-science conservatives like Ms. Palin running loose.
- lliiffee 18y agoI think you are wrong about schools. Obama repeatedly mentioned support of Charter schools (though not vouchers) in the debates. He specifically mentioned Michelle Rhee in DC as doing good work, which is highly encouraging to many of us who think Democrats have been on the wrong side of the education debate. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Rhee http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Rhee PS, I think you are right about "card check", which seems to me like one of the most important issues in this election which has gotten approximately zero public debate.