8 ms·

The CSS3 Test

73 points by gtzi 15y ago

chrisacky 15y ago
What is it? I loaded it up in Internet Explorer and the page wouldn't render.
- fourspace 15y ago
  If you don't show up to take the exam, it's pretty obvious what your grade will be.
- dangrossman 15y ago
  http://i.imgur.com/G3iN5.png http://i.imgur.com/G3iN5.png
- Zirro 15y ago
  Which version?
- 0ne 15y ago
  I loaded the page in IE8 and it's barely readable. Almost nothing shows up. I guess that's the score itself.
- esonderegger 15y ago
  In case you're curious about what it looks like in IE7 (the only browser I'm allowed to have on my work machine): http://www.listensocial.com/images/css3test.png http://www.listensocial.com/images/css3test.png
JonnieCache 15y ago
Very nice. One quibble - The warning in the top right is a tiny bit ambiguous, it would read better as: "Caution: This test checks which CSS3 features the browser recognizes, not whether they are implemented correctly."
- leaverou 15y ago
  Edited, thanks!
Zirro 15y ago
Now there's a nice surprise, Nightly (Firefox-alpha build) actually scores one percent higher than Chrome Canary. I do hope Mozilla catches up in other areas, there needs to be more than one large non-Webkit browser out there to push the web forward.
- alexchamberlain 15y ago
  I don't disagree, but why does there need to be another rendering engine? Webkit do push forward too.
  - Zirro 15y ago
    Gecko pushed forward too. Then they stopped, they got large and bulky. Things changes, one day Webkit won't be the ones to be first with the new. Competition fuels this process. We should have learned this lesson from Internet Explorers dominance in the past.
    - MatthewPhillips 15y ago
      WebKit isn't the first with the new today. In terms of features Firefox and Chrome (not WebKit generally, specifically Chrome) are pretty much neck and neck. They each have their priorities which reflects which "beats" the other in specific features. Chrome has already released Web RTC and Web Intents, Firefox has already released calc() and (current) IndexedDB. I think you're referring to Firefox from a couple of years ago, their pace has ramped up since they moved to rolling releases.
      - Zirro 15y ago
        Well, I am referring to the image the (slightly techish) public has of Firefox as an outdated, slow competitor to Chrome. As I follow it's development closely, however, I am aware they are getting better again and this I why still use it as my primary browser.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
CWIZO 15y ago
Does this check vendor prefixed (-webkit,-moz,...) "features" too?
- leaverou 15y ago
  Yes, as long as their unprefixed equivalent is in a W3C specification.
pestaa 15y ago
I am actually a bit surprised the latest Opera didn't score better than 56%. Oh well, I guess I'd complain about the speed if everything was implemented.
CapitalistCartr 15y ago
Hmm, Firefox 9.0.1 scored 0% (with Ghostery installed); Forefox 10 scored 60%. They both still score 95% in the Acid3 test. I'm not uninstalling Ghostery, whatever the score.
- emp_ 15y ago
  Thank you for mentioning Ghostery, they have a Chrome extension too!
- afhof 15y ago
  Firefox scores 0% with NoScript installed as well.
- eCa 15y ago
  9.0.1 scored 58%.
yahelc 15y ago
Here's Lea Verou's (the creator) blog post about this: http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-browser-support/ http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-...
reedlaw 15y ago
Chrome 18.0.1025.1 dev scores 63%
- iso8859-1 15y ago
  1% lower than v16
bcardarella 15y ago
I hope they are recording the user agents and versions. That data would be very valuable.
- leaverou 15y ago
  Yup, it's all here: http://www.browserscope.org/browse?category=usertest_agt1YS1wcm9maWxlcnINCxIEVGVzdBidzawNDA&bookmark=Xz0yODA2NDY4MCZfX2tleV9fPWFndDFZUzF3Y205bWFXeGxjbklWQ3hJTVVtVnpkV3gwVUdGeVpXNTBHTXF4c2cwTSZjcmVhdGVkPTIwMTItMDItMDIrMTMlM0EzMiUzQTU3LjY0ODY5Nw== http://www.browserscope.org/browse?category=usertest_agt1YS1...
duopixel 15y ago
I'm curious to see how IE10 preview scores in this test, anyone have it handy?
- pushtheenvelope 15y ago
  The author's blog post claims this: Chrome Canary, WebKit nightlies, Firefox Nightly: 64% Chrome, IE10PP4: 63% source: http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-browser-support/ http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-...
ekianjo 15y ago
Anyone tried IE9 ? I wonder how much it scores.

The CSS3 Test

73 points by gtzi 15y ago

chrisacky 15y ago

What is it? I loaded it up in Internet Explorer and the page wouldn't render.

fourspace 15y ago
If you don't show up to take the exam, it's pretty obvious what your grade will be.
dangrossman 15y ago
http://i.imgur.com/G3iN5.png http://i.imgur.com/G3iN5.png
Zirro 15y ago
Which version?
0ne 15y ago
I loaded the page in IE8 and it's barely readable. Almost nothing shows up. I guess that's the score itself.
esonderegger 15y ago
In case you're curious about what it looks like in IE7 (the only browser I'm allowed to have on my work machine): http://www.listensocial.com/images/css3test.png http://www.listensocial.com/images/css3test.png

JonnieCache 15y ago

Very nice. One quibble - The warning in the top right is a tiny bit ambiguous, it would read better as: "Caution: This test checks which CSS3 features the browser recognizes, not whether they are implemented correctly."

leaverou 15y ago
Edited, thanks!

Zirro 15y ago

Now there's a nice surprise, Nightly (Firefox-alpha build) actually scores one percent higher than Chrome Canary. I do hope Mozilla catches up in other areas, there needs to be more than one large non-Webkit browser out there to push the web forward.

alexchamberlain 15y ago
I don't disagree, but why does there need to be another rendering engine? Webkit do push forward too.
- Zirro 15y ago
  Gecko pushed forward too. Then they stopped, they got large and bulky. Things changes, one day Webkit won't be the ones to be first with the new. Competition fuels this process. We should have learned this lesson from Internet Explorers dominance in the past.
  - MatthewPhillips 15y ago
    WebKit isn't the first with the new today. In terms of features Firefox and Chrome (not WebKit generally, specifically Chrome) are pretty much neck and neck. They each have their priorities which reflects which "beats" the other in specific features. Chrome has already released Web RTC and Web Intents, Firefox has already released calc() and (current) IndexedDB. I think you're referring to Firefox from a couple of years ago, their pace has ramped up since they moved to rolling releases.
    - Zirro 15y ago
      Well, I am referring to the image the (slightly techish) public has of Firefox as an outdated, slow competitor to Chrome. As I follow it's development closely, however, I am aware they are getting better again and this I why still use it as my primary browser.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

CWIZO 15y ago

Does this check vendor prefixed (-webkit,-moz,...) "features" too?

leaverou 15y ago
Yes, as long as their unprefixed equivalent is in a W3C specification.

pestaa 15y ago

I am actually a bit surprised the latest Opera didn't score better than 56%. Oh well, I guess I'd complain about the speed if everything was implemented.

CapitalistCartr 15y ago

Hmm, Firefox 9.0.1 scored 0% (with Ghostery installed); Forefox 10 scored 60%. They both still score 95% in the Acid3 test. I'm not uninstalling Ghostery, whatever the score.

emp_ 15y ago
Thank you for mentioning Ghostery, they have a Chrome extension too!
afhof 15y ago
Firefox scores 0% with NoScript installed as well.
eCa 15y ago
9.0.1 scored 58%.

yahelc 15y ago

Here's Lea Verou's (the creator) blog post about this: http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-browser-support/ http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-...

reedlaw 15y ago

Chrome 18.0.1025.1 dev scores 63%

iso8859-1 15y ago
1% lower than v16

bcardarella 15y ago

I hope they are recording the user agents and versions. That data would be very valuable.

leaverou 15y ago
Yup, it's all here: http://www.browserscope.org/browse?category=usertest_agt1YS1wcm9maWxlcnINCxIEVGVzdBidzawNDA&bookmark=Xz0yODA2NDY4MCZfX2tleV9fPWFndDFZUzF3Y205bWFXeGxjbklWQ3hJTVVtVnpkV3gwVUdGeVpXNTBHTXF4c2cwTSZjcmVhdGVkPTIwMTItMDItMDIrMTMlM0EzMiUzQTU3LjY0ODY5Nw== http://www.browserscope.org/browse?category=usertest_agt1YS1...

duopixel 15y ago

I'm curious to see how IE10 preview scores in this test, anyone have it handy?

pushtheenvelope 15y ago
The author's blog post claims this: Chrome Canary, WebKit nightlies, Firefox Nightly: 64% Chrome, IE10PP4: 63% source: http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-browser-support/ http://lea.verou.me/2012/02/exactly-how-much-css3-does-your-...

ekianjo 15y ago

Anyone tried IE9 ? I wonder how much it scores.