3 ms·
Was just riffing on the comment that was replying to. So is the control issue in the larynx or in the brain? And if it was the brain, could some sort of AI sy
by nico 4y ago
Was just riffing on the comment that was replying to.
So is the control issue in the larynx or in the brain?
And if it was the brain, could some sort of AI system do brain <> larynx communication for the monkeys? (Via electrodes maybe?)
- xoac 4y agoYes, we just put some AI via electrodes into the monkeys. If we can also add some blockchain, I think we'll have a winner. Let's circle back Monday on this idea, I'd like to pick your brain some more.
- haliskerbas 4y agoYou're mocking the parent but isn't this what most BCIs do? Electrodes + signal processing to estimate some output.
- Retric 4y agoNot really, BCIs are still more about teaching the user to make a recognizable signal vs interpreting something that already exists.
- GauntletWizard 4y agoYes, but Brain-Computer Interfaces are not currently an especially advanced field of study. We don't have the precision needed to do any of that as currently stands.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jancsika 4y agoI think you meant, "pick nico's LLM." In any case, you bring up an important issue: can monkeys bitcoin? Could we backport a blockchain experiment in the same way that demoscene Hungarians have backported math hacks to fuel unexpectedly sophisticated realtime graphics to the C64?
- pdpi 4y ago>In any case, you bring up an important issue: can monkeys bitcoin? What's the hashrate of infinite monkeys on typewriters?
- nico 4y ago> Could we backport a blockchain experiment Interesting. Translating from human language to monkey language = backporting Would it then be that: AI language -> human language also equals backporting?