3 ms·
> both have perfectly workable public transport systems Only if you confine yourself to downtowns. Which is why I said metro areas. > India is a third world c
by RestlessMind 4y ago
> both have perfectly workable public transport systems
Only if you confine yourself to downtowns. Which is why I said metro areas.
> India is a third world country
It is a third world country with lots of modern parts. If you don't think Mumbai or Bangalore or modern cities, that just means you have a very different definition of what modern means.
- TheHappyOddish 4y agoYou seems to have missed the context of this comment chain. We were discussing cities. I have no idea what a "metro" or "downtown" is. > I’d be careful about extrapolating these results across cities. In most American cities, for example, I’m going to replace an e-scooter with an Uber. I also never said modern cities, I said "the modern world", of which India would generally not be considered part of. I may have defined that poorly though, my bad.