You're right, but I don't yet know, and haven't been advised by my telco (who also owns that tower) what will happen during that migration next year. My handse

You're right, but I don't yet know, and haven't been advised by my telco (who also owns that tower) what will happen during that migration next year. My handset (Pixel 4A original) will need replacing if they go 5G only - I guess they will go 4 & 5 combined, but see above. I don't know if my Telstra-installed (~ 2 years ago) repeater will work with 5G, or I'll need to buy a replacement. I don't know if I have any recourse or remedy in the event that I lose all connectivity after the 3G retirement. Signal propagation is weird. When the tech installed my repeater and yagi, most of the time was spent finding the optimum direction - he ended up pointing it at a hill probably 10 degrees off the measured direction for the tower (line of sight is impossible for us). So, yes, you're right ... but still. Anyway, Australia has some of the best mobile service coverage in populated areas - that's why they talk about percentage of humans that have coverage, not land area. And I totally understand why. Reviewing https://www.telstra.com.au/coverage-networks/our-coverage https://www.telstra.com.au/coverage-networks/our-coverage - where I am, unboosted 3G, and to a lesser degree, 4G zones are asserted to be within several km of me - but the nearest 5G blob is ~60km. There's no 'coverage coming soon' zones within 300km of me. And yes, I blame privatisation. Prior to that, if you wanted a landline service, connection fee was flat, no matter where you were. If that had continued on, presumably the same policy would apply today for other services. Contesting for last-mile means it's now hideously expensive to the consumer - similarly for power connection - compared to a few decades ago.