One can legitimately be a terrorist and commit terrorism. The problem is that the popular definition of terrorism is so nebulous as to be useless. We've charge

One can legitimately be a terrorist and commit terrorism. The problem is that the popular definition of terrorism is so nebulous as to be useless. We've charged as terrorists people who have attacked soldiers stationed in a foreign invader's military base (http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/the_real_definition_of_terrorism/ http://www.salon.com/2011/12/10/the_real_definition_of_terro... and http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/000860.html http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/archives/000860.html for examples). Those are purely military targets attacked in wartime... At the same time, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/27/breivik-not-terrorist-insane-murderer http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/27/breivik-not-terr...