Yeah, sure. I was prodding it to see how they handled what seems like a really hard issue and I used the built in tool to send a report. It seems to me that s

Yeah, sure. I was prodding it to see how they handled what seems like a really hard issue and I used the built in tool to send a report. It seems to me that should be one of the reasons to have a beta. To be fair my prompt didn't explicitly say anything inherently sexual, and I don't think the images would pass the test for child porn. I do find that language funny - material exploiting minors - who was exploited? I'm waiting for journalists to figure out that it's a thing easily done in Stable Diffusion and probably less easily done in other image generators to see the outrage. Personally I think that if pedophiles could generate images that might mean there'd be less of a market for real images and therefore less (real) child exploitation, but I doubt Adobe will want to make that argument ;)