3 ms·

From Adobe's TOS, which you agreed to when you accessed the app: Do not use Firefly to attempt to create, upload, or share abusive or illegal content. This incl

From Adobe's TOS, which you agreed to when you accessed the app: Do not use Firefly to attempt to create, upload, or share abusive or illegal content. This includes, but is not limited to, the following: * Pornographic material and explicit nudity * Hateful or highly offensive content that attacks or dehumanizes a group based on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, serious disease or disability, gender, age, or sexual orientation * Graphic violence or gore * The promotion, glorification, or threats of violence * Illegal activities or goods * Self-harm or the promotion of self-harm * Depictions of nude minors or minors in a sexual manner * Promotion of terrorism or violent extremism * Dissemination of misleading, fraudulent, or deceptive content that could lead to real-world harm * Personal or private information of others (like full name, home address, phone number, email address, government issued IDs, or anything else that would let someone locate or contact you in the real world). * Please note that we may report any material exploiting minors to the National Center of Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC). If at any time you believe someone has violated these Guidelines or the Adobe Firefly Beta Terms of Use, please report it by contacting us at abuse@adobe.com.

Auracle 4y ago
Yeah, sure. I was prodding it to see how they handled what seems like a really hard issue and I used the built in tool to send a report. It seems to me that should be one of the reasons to have a beta. To be fair my prompt didn't explicitly say anything inherently sexual, and I don't think the images would pass the test for child porn. I do find that language funny - material exploiting minors - who was exploited? I'm waiting for journalists to figure out that it's a thing easily done in Stable Diffusion and probably less easily done in other image generators to see the outrage. Personally I think that if pedophiles could generate images that might mean there'd be less of a market for real images and therefore less (real) child exploitation, but I doubt Adobe will want to make that argument ;)

Auracle 4y ago

Yeah, sure. I was prodding it to see how they handled what seems like a really hard issue and I used the built in tool to send a report. It seems to me that should be one of the reasons to have a beta. To be fair my prompt didn't explicitly say anything inherently sexual, and I don't think the images would pass the test for child porn. I do find that language funny - material exploiting minors - who was exploited? I'm waiting for journalists to figure out that it's a thing easily done in Stable Diffusion and probably less easily done in other image generators to see the outrage. Personally I think that if pedophiles could generate images that might mean there'd be less of a market for real images and therefore less (real) child exploitation, but I doubt Adobe will want to make that argument ;)