3 ms·
The historical lack of sequencing is because they were unsequenced in C, and C++ thus inherited it. And yes, it does seem that there were a lot more people hel
by olliej 4y ago
The historical lack of sequencing is because they were unsequenced in C, and C++ thus inherited it.
And yes, it does seem that there were a lot more people hell bent on resisting correcting unnecessary UB in the past than today, but they’re still around.
- TremendousJudge 4y agoI get it, but then, why change it now? (or 6 years ago I guess)
- olliej 4y agoSorry, I had an unsaved edit above. It seems the resistance to removing unnecessary UB has reduced over the years.