5 ms·

Thanks! The pricing is there mostly to set expectations for the future. The current release works (for the most part) for individual users and it would not supp

Thanks! The pricing is there mostly to set expectations for the future. The current release works (for the most part) for individual users and it would not support a team well. Hocus is free for up to 3 users, so we expect people who deploy the alpha version not to pay a thing.

inhumantsar 4y ago
For a self-hosted solution that pricing is a complete non-starter. I have a team of 30 devs, so it would be $1,200/mo. That's on par with GitHub's enterprise plan plus Codespaces instance usage. There's no way I could consider this for my company at that price.
- hugodutka 4y ago
  Hocus is more cost-efficient when you need larger instances. If you need 8 CPU cores ($0.72/hour on Codespaces) and a single dev uses their IDE for 4 hours a day on average, Codespaces itself would come out to about $0.72 * 4 * 5 * 4 * 30 = $1728 a month. But that gives me the idea that maybe we should introduce cheaper pricing plans but with limits on VM resources - pay less if you have lower compute requirements.
  - inhumantsar 4y ago
    Maybe I'm confused here, but wouldn't I still be paying instance costs on top of your per-seat license? 256 cores would be about $2.50 to $5/hr in AWS depending on reservations and how much you're able to oversubscribe. That's another $1,500 to $3,000/mo on top of your $1,170/mo. If you're paying for the compute then cool, that's a good price. If this is self-hosted though then I can't really see why I would bother unless I had no choice but to self host and cobbling together a simpler if less ideal solution isn't allowed.