3 ms·
How do you see that measure as more useful? I see it as very narrowly useful. You’ve conditioned the input to the desired output. Let’s say my gas tank is empt
by travisjungroth 4y ago
How do you see that measure as more useful? I see it as very narrowly useful. You’ve conditioned the input to the desired output.
Let’s say my gas tank is empty. One way of treating this is to drive to the gas station. This will fail often (remember, I’m out of gas). We could compare this to other treatments like using a gas can.
Driving to the gas station normally is the better treatment, because normally the gas tank isn’t really empty. But if we’re at the point of getting professional help, it’s actually the other way. We probably have a real problem. If I call up a tow truck company and their suggestion is to drive to the nearest gas station, I wouldn’t say that’s very helpful.
So your conditioning makes sense if the goal is to turn stars into superstars. It is not a good measure for treatment of people in need.
The first half of your first sentence alone should set off alarms “I question efficacy as a valid measure…”