3 ms·
Its semantics, but generally the best would be taken to refer to a superlative, gold medal at the Olympics. I'd say you just need to be good enough to attend th
by kuhewa 4y ago
Its semantics, but generally the best would be taken to refer to a superlative, gold medal at the Olympics. I'd say you just need to be good enough to attend the Olympics to attend the Olympics as a competitor. Its actually an apt analogy because there are some pretty trash athletes from some countries in some disciplines, some famously so, simply because they didn't have much local competition in their country. Survival of the fittest itself is a tautology, Darwin didn't coin it for the first edition. It doesn't really matter what the convenient slogan is, all of these concepts can be understood mathematically and it isn't the single individual or species with the highest fitness value that persists on whatever time scale is of interest.
- ltbarcly3 4y agoYou are confused about what fitness means.
- kuhewa 4y agoI am sure I am to some degree as is everyone, but whether I am insofar as it would be pertinent to the conversation I am not so sure, as I have had a decent bit of training in evolutionary biology and have written a PhD thesis and manuscripts that discuss organismal fitness at length. I can't tell if you are or aren't confused and perhaps just wanted to play with the semantics of superlatives. I reckon you seem to be dealing with the concept in a colloquial sense though.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]