2 ms·
Some other comment mentioned induction, but that doesn't make sense in the context of heating a house. Your parent comment said resistive heating is terrible f
by CyberDildonics 4y ago
Some other comment mentioned induction, but that doesn't make sense in the context of heating a house.
Your parent comment said resistive heating is terrible for heating houses, which it is.
You replied Induction... Look it up. Induction is still resistive heating and doesn't create more heat for the same electricity, so what are you talking about?
- oblio 4y agoThe entire discussion is about boilers and steam... This entire subthread is useless when you missed the original comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35393157 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35393157
- CyberDildonics 4y agoI already mentioned that comment when I said one mentioned inductive heating. What is it that you are trying to say? Inductive heating has no benefit over regular resistive electrical heating for heating a house, because it is already resistive heating. For a stove it just transfers the resistive heating to the pan directly instead of using an iron coil burner first. All you did was make a sarcastic comment but there is no context where it makes sense and it's even more bizarre that you think other comments help it make sense.