My limited understanding of case law is that transformative use is still judged very human-centricly. E.g. the courts take a dim view of any attempt to create

My limited understanding of case law is that transformative use is still judged very human-centricly. E.g. the courts take a dim view of any attempt to create a machine (in the abstract sense) that takes in copywritten works and churns out similar-but-uncopywritten works