3 ms·
Here's a photograph I created nearly 20 years ago - https://www.deviantart.com/shagie/art/Burney-Falls-1-H-4310517 https://www.deviantart.com/shagie/art/Burney-
by shagie 4y ago
Here's a photograph I created nearly 20 years ago - https://www.deviantart.com/shagie/art/Burney-Falls-1-H-4310517 https://www.deviantart.com/shagie/art/Burney-Falls-1-H-43105...
Why shouldn't I be the only one with the right to sell that image?
The course of action for "lose the rights in 20 years" isn't "ok, that's fine" but rather "ok, then I won't publish any of them and deal only in direct sales of prints from a gallery."
- pitaj 4y ago> Why shouldn't I be the only one with the right to sell that image? The real question is why should you? Copyright is not a natural right (if it was, it wouldn't require enforcement actions on people who never interacted with the original copy). It's a privilege meant to provide an incentive for artists (the effectiveness of which is questionable, even without taking into consideration the negative side-effects). > The course of action for "lose the rights in 20 years" isn't "ok, that's fine" but rather "ok, then I won't publish any of them and deal only in direct sales of prints from a gallery." And that is entirely within your rights. But once your photo is disseminated into the public sphere, it's information that you no longer have control over.