4 ms·

It's not specific to copyright, Adobe Firefly has trouble producing something as straightforward as a cat. This puts it on par with earlier renditions of compet

by quitit 4y ago

It's not specific to copyright, Adobe Firefly has trouble producing something as straightforward as a cat. This puts it on par with earlier renditions of competitor AI image generators, and just like those, I'm sure Adobe will work it out.

neom 4y ago
What types of cats are you trying to produce? https://imgur.com/a/lZDqbOw https://imgur.com/a/lZDqbOw I got decent cats with a simple prompt.
- sebzim4500 4y ago
  There's definitely something off about the first four photos, I can't put my finger on what it is though. It reminds me of early SD generations.
- quitit 4y ago
  The sloped face in your example is a fair demonstration of how a straightforward prompt is not being well rendered in Firefly. However, I believe it is unfair to hold it to such high standards or compare it to Midjourney. It is new beta software and other AI image generating products have had this same problem and managed to resolve it in less than a year. I'm certain Adobe will keep working on the Firefly image pipeline until it produces decent results.
anonylizard 4y ago
Just like they worked it out with figma right? Surely they won't be overtaken by an upstart and have to pay $20 billion for it? Firefly is absolutely underwhelming. Its been 10 months since Dalle 2, and it is just a slightly improved version of Dalle2 (With just as bad censorship filters). Adobe clearly only started their generative AI project only after Dalle 2 was released. Otherwise you would expect their internal team to have far more polished results. Like, who exactly is a user of firefly at this point? You'd work far faster just copy pasting images from Midjourney into photoshop, than trying to wrangle firefly to produce good results. If you want strong control, SD is the answer. If you hate AI, you won't use it at all. Adobe will barely get feedback data.
- killerdhmo 4y ago
  lol that is not the user they're targeting. They're targeting the express user. Someone who is definitely not using Discord or Photoshop.
  - anonylizard 4y ago
    Its unclear where these 'express users' are. Midjourney only takes a day to learn, its not rocket science to learn how to install discord. Its far faster to join midjourney and use its images, than to learn how to wrangle firefly to work.
sebzim4500 4y ago
>just like those, I'm sure Adobe will work it out. This is not guaranteed, since Adobe has a much smaller library to call on for training data than the rest of the market. This can't really change unless they follow their competitors and ignore licences etc.

by quitit 4y ago

neom 4y ago

What types of cats are you trying to produce? https://imgur.com/a/lZDqbOw https://imgur.com/a/lZDqbOw I got decent cats with a simple prompt.

sebzim4500 4y ago
There's definitely something off about the first four photos, I can't put my finger on what it is though. It reminds me of early SD generations.
quitit 4y ago
The sloped face in your example is a fair demonstration of how a straightforward prompt is not being well rendered in Firefly. However, I believe it is unfair to hold it to such high standards or compare it to Midjourney. It is new beta software and other AI image generating products have had this same problem and managed to resolve it in less than a year. I'm certain Adobe will keep working on the Firefly image pipeline until it produces decent results.

anonylizard 4y ago

Just like they worked it out with figma right? Surely they won't be overtaken by an upstart and have to pay $20 billion for it? Firefly is absolutely underwhelming. Its been 10 months since Dalle 2, and it is just a slightly improved version of Dalle2 (With just as bad censorship filters). Adobe clearly only started their generative AI project only after Dalle 2 was released. Otherwise you would expect their internal team to have far more polished results. Like, who exactly is a user of firefly at this point? You'd work far faster just copy pasting images from Midjourney into photoshop, than trying to wrangle firefly to produce good results. If you want strong control, SD is the answer. If you hate AI, you won't use it at all. Adobe will barely get feedback data.

killerdhmo 4y ago
lol that is not the user they're targeting. They're targeting the express user. Someone who is definitely not using Discord or Photoshop.
- anonylizard 4y ago
  Its unclear where these 'express users' are. Midjourney only takes a day to learn, its not rocket science to learn how to install discord. Its far faster to join midjourney and use its images, than to learn how to wrangle firefly to work.

sebzim4500 4y ago

>just like those, I'm sure Adobe will work it out. This is not guaranteed, since Adobe has a much smaller library to call on for training data than the rest of the market. This can't really change unless they follow their competitors and ignore licences etc.