I certainly agree that the arguments in that paper are unscientific and not testable. But dismissing all of it simply because it does not present any data is u

I certainly agree that the arguments in that paper are unscientific and not testable. But dismissing all of it simply because it does not present any data is unfair. Thoughts experiments [1] have been a very important catalyst of human thought and yes, of scientific progress itself. If the opinion in the paper is based on sound reasoning and logic, I would argue it deserves to be considered seriously, even if it does not contain any empirical data. [1] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thought-experiment/ https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/thought-experiment/