From what I have seen, you can't really articulate why you disagreed. Your arguments appears to be another form of "humans have it, this AI doesn't" but fail to

From what I have seen, you can't really articulate why you disagreed. Your arguments appears to be another form of "humans have it, this AI doesn't" but fail to specifically define what is this "it". The AI effect is a real thing. And even real humans had been considered unable to "reason" once upon a time. I will give everything the benefits of the doubt concerning intelligence and sentience. Because history has shown how terrible it would be to get a false negative.